http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2006/10/911_conspiracy_theory_1.html

QUOTE: “The confusion over names and identities we reported back in 2001 may have arisen because these were common Arabic and Islamic names.

In an effort to make this clearer, we have made one small change to the original story. Under the FBI picture of Waleed al Shehri we have added the words “A man called Waleed Al Shehri…” to make it as clear as possible that there was confusion over the identity. The rest of the story remains as it was in the archive as a record of the situation at the time.”

So the BBC admits there was confusion at the time and they got a WRONG name and picture!

Of course idiots like you will never answer the logic question I posed, I they were alive would not someone like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad use them to hurt the USA? This is why people like you are major suckers, you can’t think you only believe what some con man tells you.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/1559151.stm

read a book

Of course he scoffed, truthers are inbred idiots.

And on that crappy conspiracy theorist movie”
“But that’s not the whole story. “Loose Change” may traffic in fiction, but it sinks its hooks in.”

Yep it’s “Fiction”

You will note ALL these people still say Bin Laden did it.

“CLELAND: America’s enemies have been… have declared war on this country. But who declared war on the country? It was Osama bin Laden, and his terrorist cadre. And Islamic fanatics. That’s what 9/11 was all about. It was not about Saddam Hussein.”

So Cleland know who did it.
or this

CLELAND: And years ago, Osama bin Laden declared open war on the United States, why? Because we support the monarchy in Saudi Arabia, we support the leadership in Egypt. And that tees off a whole lot of folks out there.

Did you even bother to read the shit fed to you from Jones, NO, only the parts they cherry pick from the interview. That is pure ignorance.

And of course NIST and all REAL structural engineers agree the towers and WTC7 fell due to fires and were NOT a controlled demolition. So a bunch of idiots like Rosie O’Donnell, Hal Sparkes AND! Gary Busey? Come on, only a fool would consider Busey and authority on anything. But thinks for the link, Busey is going to get big time laughs among the rationalist.

On to your apparent stereotype of Christians being the primary opponents of Atheism. I can almost guarantee that Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, Jews, the homeless guys who run around in tinfoil fats and moon boots screaming at cars, and virtually all other religious groups are opponents to Atheism. I recommend you either broaden your terms or prepare for the hate of everybody who disagrees with other people.

Now to quote you, this is the very last phrase of Paragraph 3:
“but ask what came before god and they don’t even want to think about it”
The Christian and Muslim answers are quite simple, and very much the same: “God was, is and will be”, or in other words, God has no beginning or end. The Hindu answer is rather intriguing to think about, and that is that a god called Brahma created everything, and that since then the universe has undergone an infinite number of deaths and rebirths at the hands of a god known as Shiva who carries a drum to sound the birth of the universe and a fire that will destroy it in the distant future.

As a final point, the use of Darwin as an example of an Atheist is simply playing on the stereotypes of the unknowing masses. A technique that is quite popular among the various “news” sources we see every day.

On a side note, isn’t titling this thread “Pull the Plug on Christianity” in and of itself religious hatred? A website is just as public as any billboard, and under some circumstances even more so.

Thanks for taking the time to read my response, I hope it is informative, or at least thought-provoking for all who read it.
-John

Which are you then? A twenty-something slacker in your mom’s basement or an aging, drug-addled hippie?