OK truthers. Here’s the offer. I would have preferred to post it in one of your groups but you guys have banned me for having the bad taste to prove your silliness wrong. Prove controlled demolition to me and I’ll give you $5,000 (I’ve lowered it from $100,000 because I might be able to actually afford $5,000). If you accept the offer and think you’ve proven your case, then if I don’t pay, you can take me to court for breach of contract and a court can decide if you actually have proven your case. What do you say? Put up or shut up.

To prevent me from having to deal with possibly defending myself in multiple cases at a time (on the off chance that a truther actually had the balls to try to make his case in court), this offer is to the person who first accepts it here only. If they fail, I can renew the offer to a second person.
And I won’t even try to get the case dismissed for other reasons. I’d love to see you try to make your case in court.

To contact Ron about his offer, follow this link to the FB page and message him through there.

This really should be put in the fiction section of your video store

In the Oliver Stone film JFK Kevin Costner plying the part of New Orleans Jim Garrison screens the Zapruder film to a jury, pausing and rewinding to show the direction that Kennedy’s head appears to move. As he does this, he repeats the phrase, “back, and to the left”, trying to prove the location of the alleged second gunman. It’s a powerful bit of pop culture propaganda, but does it mean anything true?

What you probably don’t know is in Nov. 2008 a team of experts assembled by the Discovery Channel has recreated the assassination of  Kennedy. Using modern blood spatter analysis, artificial human body surrogates and 3-D computer simulations.  In the end the team determined that the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository was the most likely origin of the shot that killed the president. Once again some smart ass scientist ruin a perfectly good conspiracy theory.

The team created the most advanced artificial human heads in the world for the ballistic tests. The heads have three different materials which simulate the brain, skull and external skin, that together respond to the trauma the same way a human head would. The position of the people in the limousine were created exactly, the same sort of rifle was used as was the distance fired. Test shots were also done from the grassy knoll, and four other plausible locations. BUT Only the shot from the six floor school book location matched the actual physical evidence from that day.

This is not the first time some scientist had done experiments looking at the movement of a human head when shot from behind. Richard Trott used melons to show the exit of the bullet creates a ”jet effect” phenomenon that drove the melons back towards the gun shot. Dr. John Lattimer reproduced Trott’s results with human skulls.  All of them showed the ”Back and to the Left” movement that conspiracy theorist love to recite as a religious mantra, it’s like the free-fall chant of the 9/11 truthers, say it long and loud and perhaps it will become true.

But, conspiracy theories sell… and sell big, Not only for a movie like JFK but books and DVDs. Jim Marrs was the big name in JFK conspiracy theorist with his book Crossfire. But just a look at his web site http://www.jimmarrs.com/ and you see a loony who pimps everything from Obama paranoia to UFOs from Mars.  While Vincent bugliosi (yes the Charles Manson prosecutor) Reclaiming History: The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy which defends the Warren Commission’s conclusion is not exactly flying off the shelves, and it’s the most authoritative book on the subject. Same with Case Closed by Gerald Posner. Posner is well respected as a researcher and writer of everything from Mengele to Motown. It’s is fun to read the conspiracy theorist frothing at the mouth in the Amazon reviews over these two books, you would think you pissed on their god, But to the conspiracy theorist types this is a religion, once you drink the Kool-Aid and worshipped at the alter of fashionable pseudo-skepticism it’s hard to say you were duped by a pop culture fad.

1944 Over the Battle of the Bulge

Condensation Trail are a real and harmless phenomena, but to the conspiracy theorist they turn into secret chemical spraying operation called Chemtrails by known or unknown powerful entities.

Conspiracy theorist  insist that chemtrails are different and that they can be distinguished from contrails. They claim that contrails are  thin and disperse quickly, while chemtrails are longer lasting and hang in the air in a manner that water vapor would not, as if they never seen a cloud. They also claim that it can be demonstrated by the fact that multiple aircraft may be seen at the same time, with some leaving trails and others do not forgetting altitude matters, a jet flying higher or lower may be in a jet stream with very different temperature and humidity, an aircraft flying only slightly higher can produce a contrail and the lower aircraft none.

B17 Bombers over Germany

You don’t have to look to far to find pictures of WWII aircraft leaving contrails. so are we to believe the US and England sprayed Germany with chemicals? In a recent article in New Scientist researchers found the extra water vapor released into the air over England with the formation of larger bomber groups may have had a small effect on local temperatures, but the effect is small and would involve larger numbers of aircraft flying in close assembled formations. Any effect vapor trails would come only from the blocking of sunlight and even then it would be negligible.

You will also notice these “Chemtrails” are more likely to form when you see Cirrus clouds.  Atmospheric clouds that are characterized by thin, wispy strands, often bunched into tufts very much like contrails.

The one thing the conspiracy theorist never want to address is the old critical thinkers question of  WHY? If you wanted to distribute some mind altering drug WHY do it at 2000 feet when doing it at much lower altitudes would work much more effectively. WHY use a chemical that leaves a trail at all? Gasses do not need to be seen to work you know.

The other question is HOW?  These trails obviously come from passenger aircraft, seen it myself, so HOW do you get the passenger service to go along with this? Why don’t you see passenger aircraft mechanics questioning chemical spraying equipment in their jets?

via YouTube – Alex Jones Says Gay People are Created by the Government.

No big mystery here. Of all the hundreds of thousands of vehicle accidents each year the vast majority are caused by driver error. And a smaller present weather related. The weakest link in the car is the nut that attaches the steering wheel to the drivers seat.

Yet you are supposed to believe the current hype and buy the very unlikely situation where these cars are suffering full throttle acceleration BUT also complete failure of the brakes.  AND all this without trace of this double system failure in the cars involved. Nobody has seen this happen to these cars under controlled observable conditions, often using the same cars that drivers have said suffered the event. And these test are not just being performed by the government and the manufacturers but also by organizations who would just love to prove the cars are at fault and yet even they can’t reproduce the claimed events.

Blaming the government and corporations seems to be very popular with a certain segment of the population, unfortunately popular opinion does not make the reality of the situation what they want it to be. And it only tends to make it harder to hold corporations feet to the fire when they really do something wrong.

The Punching Bag Hits Back: Prius Crash Was Driver Error.

Team Unintended Acceleration

It’s been about fifteen years now since the issue of unintended acceleration was the big thing in the publics mind. At that time auto maker Audi was the one who got the majority of the blame for this supposed action whereby cars would accelerate away all on their own. Today it’s Toyota. But fact is nearly every car at one time or another have had reports of this happening. Quite frankly the issue is not with the cars but in majority of cases caused by drivers PUSHING ON THE WRONG PEDAL! In some really sad cases this error has caused injury and death. People didn’t want to accept this accident as driver error, especially if you were the one who’s momentary error caused an injury or death, it had to be a fault with the car and the big bad uncaring corporations who built them. I remember the woman who ran over her child with her Audi, you had to feel sorry for her as she described the accident and you could understand exactly why placing the blame on the car was far better for her mental well being than dealing with the reality of the event.

Well Toyota is now the maker suffering from this Unintended Pedal Confusion issue. The problem is the executives at Toyota have not learned from Audi’s mistake. They seem to be afraid to call the issues like it is, too afraid of offending customers and in the process looking guilty as hell. There also is no shortage of trial lawyers who will be glad to sue a major auto makers for $$$$$$$.

This does not stop media hype from playing on peoples fears. Audi suffered a decline in sales in the USA because of a report on TV’s 60 Minutes which purported to show that Audi automobiles suffered from this acceleration problem. Independent investigators concluded that this was most likely due to a close placement of the accelerator and brake pedals on Audi’s automatic transmission cars. You see unlike 1970 era American cars with their wide brake pedal and small gas pedal, Audi used pedal placement more in line with European tradition and derived from it’s manual transmission cars. Many Americans were now buying these cars due to higher gas prices, and being use to the American pedal arrangement found they had a tendency when not paying attention to confuse the two. It’s not like Audi was putting the gas pedal on the left and the brakes on the right, you could make a case that doing so would be negligent, but using a pedal placement that millions of drivers both American and Foreign have had no issue with is not reckless. Get into most cars today and you will find this European pedal setup is very common.

The only thing that seems to be a legitimate issue in the Toyota case is improperly installed floor mats, and not just floor mats but the heavy rubber floor mats. On some cars these rubber mats are designed to REPLACE the carpet mats and NOT to be placed on top of the carpet mats. These can get pushed forward and cause the gas pedal to stick. But again this looks to be a problem of the drivers improperly installing them or removing the mats to clean and then not using the floor attachment hooks to hold the mats in place or breaking the hooks when removing the mats.

If you know anything about cars you know no car with operational brakes can overpower those brakes. Even it the throttle sticks wide open you only need to step on the brakes and the car will come to a stop, it may take longer but it will stop. If you push on the brakes pedal and put the car in gear and push the gas pedal to the floor, the car will go nowhere, you may damage the transmission in the process but the brakes will hold the car. it would take a car with very poor brakes and lots of power indeed for the engine to overpower the brakes. When you hear of drivers claiming to push on the brakes with both feet as the car accelerates always you have to ask yourself “do they really have both feet on the brakes?” or is it a common bad driving habit you see with far too many drivers, that is driving with one foot on the gas and one on the brake. I am sure you have seen it before, a car cruising down the freeway, brakes lights on because the driver is slightly pushing on the brake with their left foot. Not only does this make it impossible to tell if the person is really stopping but it causes the brakes to drag causing heat to build up in the pads and rotors, this heat can decrease the efficiency of the stopping power of the car when most needed. You can also see that in a panic situation a left foot brake person may well find themselves mashing on both the gas and brake at the same time. PLEASE! If your habit is to use your left foot to operate the brake, please stop now, This is just piss poor driving and dangerous. Hey, maybe it’s time for cars to have vocal warnings to prevent drivers from pushing on both pedals at the same time.

Here is the situation in a nutshell. If these cars were in fact running away at full throttle and at the same time the brakes were refusing to work you would certainly see someone who could reproduce the situation and prove their point. If it were a mechanical issue you would see investigators with parts showing these mechanical problems like broken return springs or stuck accelerator actuators. So far all the facts point to driver error or improperly installed floor mats.

FBI agents investigating a February 15 bomb hoax that evacuated the mechanical engineering building at Purdue University traced the phone call to the juvenile’s Oxford, North Carolina home. They served his mother with a search warrant and arrested the teen. He does have an attorney and will get his day in court.

The claim that the boy is a victim of USA PATRIOT, though, appears to have been cut from whole cloth. While there’s plenty to criticize in that post-9/11 law, it doesn’t contain any provision that abrogates a defendant’s right to a trial. It’s also not responsible for making it illegal to phone in a bomb threat. That’s been a federal crime since 1939.

Bloggers, TV, Go Nuts Over Misleading ‘Patriot Act’ Arrest Claim | Threat Level | Wired.com.

Blogs and talk radio on the left and right have been howling over the original rumor, but strangely quiet now that the story is proving to be over hyped fear mongering. These so called news sources play to the popular conspiratorial viewpoint, people eat up claims of big bad evil men taking away your rights but suddenly become deaf to the real story.

This is one of those stories that when I first heard it set off my bullshit detector. It didn’t sound right, and sure enough the truth is far less ominous than the ballyhoo.

-

“I do believe sadly it’s going to take some diseases coming back to realize that we need to change and develop vaccines that are safe. If the vaccine companies are not listening to us, it’s their f___ing fault that the diseases are coming back. They’re making a product that’s s___. If you give us a safe vaccine, we’ll use it. It shouldn’t be polio versus autism.”
Jenny McCarthy in Time Magazine, April 2009

WTF!!!!!! So some blond “shit for brains” bimbo can’t accept her child was born with an awful affliction, and want to blame it on modern medical science. AND now she thinks it’s OK for other innocent children to be exposed to easily preventable diseases just to add validity to HER demonetization of actually do something for world besides pose in Playboy.

Hey, never mind the fact there is absolutely no evidence that vaccines cause autism, but plenty of real verifiable proof that vaccinations have almost eliminated cases of Measles, Mumps and Rubella in modern societies.

But she is a celebrity, so what she thinks must be true.

Team Unintended Acceleration

It’s been about fifteen years now since the issue of unintended acceleration was the big thing in the publics mind. At that time auto maker Audi was the one who got the majority of the blame for this supposed action whereby cars would accelerate away all on their own. Today it’s Toyota. But fact is nearly every car at one time or another have had reports of this happening. Quite frankly the issue is not with the cars but is caused by drivers PUSHING ON THE WRONG PEDAL! In some really sad cases this error has caused injury and death. People didn’t want to accept this accident as driver error, to them it had to be a fault with the car and the bid bad uncaring corporations.

If you know anything about cars you know no car with operational brakes can overpower those brakes. Even it the throttle sticks wide open you only need to step on the brakes and the car will come to a stop, it may take slightly longer but it will stop. If you push on the brakes pedal and put the car in gear and push the gas pedal to the floor, the car will go nowhere, you may damage the transmission in the process but the brakes will hold the car. it would take a car with very poor brakes and lots of power indeed for the engine to overpower the brakes.

This does not stop media hype from playing on peoples fears. Audi suffered a decline in sales in the USA because of a report on TV’s 60 Minutes which purported to show that Audi automobiles suffered from this acceleration problem. Independent investigators concluded that this was most likely due to a close placement of the accelerator and brake pedals on Audi’s automatic transmission cars. You see unlike 1970 era American cars with their wide brake pedal and small gas pedal, Audi used pedal placement more in line with European tradition and derived from it’s manual transmission cars. Many Americans were now buying these cars due to higher gas prices, and being used to the American pedal arrangement found they had a tendency when not paying attention to confuse the two. It’s not like Audi was putting the gas pedal on the left and the brakes on the right, you could make a case that do so would be negligent, but using a pedal placement that millions of drivers both American and Foreign have had no issue with is not reckless. Get into most cars today and you will find this European pedal setup is very common.

There is nothing wrong with this pedal setup and it is in fact preferred by drivers who like high performance manual transmission cars. In race cars and high performance driving, when manually downshifting under heavy braking, the accelerator has to be used in order to match revs properly so both pedals have to be close to each other to be operated by the right foot at once, a driving technique called “heel-and-toe”, with the toe on the brake and heel on the accelerator while the left foot operated the clutch.

Well Toyota is now the maker suffering from this Unintended Pedal Confusion issue. The problem is the executives at Toyota have not learned from Audi’s mistake. They seem to be afraid to call the issues like it is, too afraid of offending customers and in the process looking guilty.