Add

The Real Story of World Trade Center 7


Another of the big lies the 9/11 Truth people want you to believe is that WTC7 received little damage and must have been imploded with explosives. These stories from the firemen who were on site that day prove otherwise. Mind you these are guy who stood right next to the building not a little dweb sitting on moms couch watching Loose Change.

“A little north of Vesey I said, we’ll go down, let’s see what’s going on. A couple of the other officers and I were going to see what was going on. We were told to go to Greenwich and Vesey and see what’s going on. So we go there and on the north and east side of 7 it didn’t look like there was any damage at all, but then you looked on the south side of 7 there had to be a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors. Debris was falling down on the building and it didn’t look good.

But they had a hoseline operating. Like I said, it was hitting the sidewalk across the street, but eventually they pulled back too. Then we received an order from Fellini, we’re going to make a move on 7. That was the first time really my stomach tightened up because the building didn’t look good. I was figuring probably the standpipe systems were shot. There was no hydrant pressure. I wasn’t really keen on the idea. Then this other officer I’m standing next to said, that building doesn’t look straight. So I’m standing there. I’m looking at the building. It didn’t look right, but, well, we’ll go in, we’ll see.

So we gathered up rollups and most of us had masks at that time. We headed toward 7. And just around we were about a hundred yards away and Butch Brandies came running up. He said forget it, nobody’s going into 7, there’s creaking, there are noises coming out of there, so we just stopped. And probably about 10 minutes after that, Visconti, he was on West Street, and I guess he had another report of further damage either in some basements and things like that, so Visconti said nobody goes into 7, so that was the final thing and that was abandoned.

Firehouse: When you looked at the south side, how close were you to the base of that side?

Boyle: I was standing right next to the building, probably right next to it.

Firehouse: When you had fire on the 20 floors, was it in one window or many?

Boyle: There was a huge gaping hole and it was scattered throughout there. It was a huge hole. I would say it was probably about a third of it, right in the middle of it. And so after Visconti came down and said nobody goes in 7, we said all right, we’ll head back to the command post. We lost touch with him. I never saw him again that day.”

Firehouse.com’s 9-11 Coverage: News 9/9/02 – WTC: This Is Their Story

The Discussion

see what everyone is saying

  • Ken D. Webber December 1st, 2007 at 9:06 AM #1

    But what you didn’t say is telling. IF a building was that damaged on the southside then physics says that it will fall over on its SOUTH SIDE and not straight down! IF the fires were really a threat and burning out of control then they would have made it over to the other side of the building which they did NOT. On the other side of the building you see only very small fires, burning black at that indicating a very low temperature, and only on a very few floors. Low burning fires such as these cannot weaken hardened steel. With no damage to ALL of the support columns there is ZERO chance that a building will suddenly experience TOTAL SIMULTANEOUS collapse of its support columns. And in the end, you can always find OTHER firemen who were there that say it WAS an inside job.

Respond

get in on the action.

* Required