<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 9/11 Truthers Just as Good as CRAP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.motorsportsartist.com/nogod/911truth/911-truthers-just-as-good-as-crap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.motorsportsartist.com/nogod/911truth/911-truthers-just-as-good-as-crap/</link>
	<description>Free from the Mind Clogging Rhetoric of Religion, Pseudoscience and Popular Myths</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:58:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.motorsportsartist.com/nogod/911truth/911-truthers-just-as-good-as-crap/comment-page-1/#comment-1061</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motorsportsartist.com/nogod/?p=693#comment-1061</guid>
		<description>&quot;the 9/11 Commission Report as well as NIST and FEMA papers were never peer reviewed at all...&quot; Boris

&quot;This fools is terribly misinformed&quot;

1. Criminal investigations are not subject to peer review. Apples and Oranges.

2. FEMA was for all intents and purposes never meant to be the conclusive authority, and they even say so.

3. NIST is peer reviewed and someone who could be bothered to google &quot;NIST peer review&quot; would have found out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the 9/11 Commission Report as well as NIST and FEMA papers were never peer reviewed at all&#8230;&#8221; Boris</p>
<p>&#8220;This fools is terribly misinformed&#8221;</p>
<p>1. Criminal investigations are not subject to peer review. Apples and Oranges.</p>
<p>2. FEMA was for all intents and purposes never meant to be the conclusive authority, and they even say so.</p>
<p>3. NIST is peer reviewed and someone who could be bothered to google &#8220;NIST peer review&#8221; would have found out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris Epstein</title>
		<link>http://www.motorsportsartist.com/nogod/911truth/911-truthers-just-as-good-as-crap/comment-page-1/#comment-500</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris Epstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 23:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motorsportsartist.com/nogod/?p=693#comment-500</guid>
		<description>Oh, sure, here you are being all judgmental about the merits of various scientific publications. Just for your reference, the 9/11 Commission Report as well as NIST and FEMA papers were never peer reviewed at all prior to publication.

But you know what... Here&#039;s something I recall. Weren&#039;t you supposed to get in touch with me to set up a 9/11 debate some months ago... A half-year or so... What gives, Admin? You know you can&#039;t win so you chicken out or what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, sure, here you are being all judgmental about the merits of various scientific publications. Just for your reference, the 9/11 Commission Report as well as NIST and FEMA papers were never peer reviewed at all prior to publication.</p>
<p>But you know what&#8230; Here&#8217;s something I recall. Weren&#8217;t you supposed to get in touch with me to set up a 9/11 debate some months ago&#8230; A half-year or so&#8230; What gives, Admin? You know you can&#8217;t win so you chicken out or what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

