WTC7 WAS HIT!
More times then not you will hears a 911 truther say that World Trade Center Building 7 was undamaged by the collapse of the twin towers. They will often quote a reports from the NYFD that the building showed little damage, just some broken windows. What these con men will not tell you is that minor damage report was about the condition of WTC7 after the collapse of the south tower and NOT the much closer North Tower. You will not hear from the truthers the incredible damage WTC7 suffered when a good portion of the North Tower sliced a 20 story gash in the south face of building 7.
This damage and the fires caused by the falling debris is well documented by the firemen who saw the perilous state the building was in. In fact parts of 7 were observed leaning and bulging as the fires inside weakened the internal structure. It’s not a conspiracy that firemen on site knew building 7 was going to fall, just astute judgement by men who knew a dangerous situation when they saw it.
The video below is interesting in it clearly shows WTC7 being hit by falling debris from WTC1.
Think WTC7 was far away from the two towers? The photo below is a dramatic demonstration do exactly how the close WTC7 was from the doomed towers, In fact this picture was taken from the South tower which was the farthest from building 7.

16 Responses to “WTC7 WAS HIT!”
Discussion Area - Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.

And thats what made fortress WTC7 to collapse in it’s own footprint in 6.2 seconds? Dust?
And kinda strange that debris was hurled 700 feet from the actual collapse to land on WTC7, don’t you think?
Well if you knew anything The south face of WTC7 was only 300 feet from the north face of WTC1, Debris from WTC did fall up to 700 feet. Gee and you say it fell within it’s footprint? Look at the debris field pictures and you will see that is not true. And look at the picture of WTC7 after it fell and you will se it damaged all the building around it, Some BIG footprint WTC7 had!
Considering the towers were over 1300 feet tall and that as you can see the sides fell outwards. Hitting a very close WTC7 was no problem at all. That “dust” as you call it sliced a 20 story gouge in the face of WTC so there was a large portion of the towers structure in that dust. Sorry but this is fact and corroborated by all the firemen at the site who saw it.
Here is another fact, much of WTC7 south face and the internal structure under the east penthouse fell well before the north face finally collapse. It took 7 to 8 seconds for the north face to fall which is well within the time it takes a 750 feet tall structure to fall.
Parroting the “Party Line” of the truthers only show extreme gullibility.
Nice video (up top), although the words “probably” and “most likely” used throughout the video highlight the speculative nature of the content.
It also fails to explain how a normal run-of-the-mill collapse could jettison those “5-6 ton pieces of steel” all the way over to WTC7. Plus, how did the other WTC buildings survive all the debris? If WTC7 got a “knife to the gut”, the WTC buildings that didn’t collapse that day got 15 stab wounds, 30 gunshot wounds, and a frying pan to the face.
Wow, just noticed that it’s now a *20* story gash in WTC7. You would think that building is still standing to this day, because that gash just keeps growing in size every time I hear about it!
Can’t wait for that NIST report by the end of the year..! If nothing else, it sure will be entertaining!
PS - Tigers suck; go Tribe! :p
“Can’t wait for that NIST report by the end of the year..! If nothing else, it sure will be entertaining!”
Yeah, like you will read it and have what it take to understand what it says.
Come on you know being a truther all this stuff is over your head. Stick to baseball its easy to understand.
“Yeah, like you will read it and have what it take (sic) to understand what it says.”
On the contrary, I will read it immediately after it’s released, and do whatever additional research is necessary (if any) to understand the contents.
Either way, it doesn’t matter all that much — to quote Tony Soprano, “You don’t need a gynecologist to know which way the wind blows.”
You don’t need to be a blacksmith to know heat will make steel soft enough to be twisted like a pretzel.
But you do have to have some understanding of how the physics of large scale structures will cause all of the things you saw on 911. No bombs just massive amounts of storied energy (mass and gravity) being released in a 18 collapse event.
You do need to understand the huge amount of preparation it takes to implode a building, If you did you would understand why it could not have been done on 911 without many people knowing about it.
But you don’t want to know this hard science stuff because it would spoil your “I am a truth seeker” fantasy world.
“You do need to understand the huge amount of preparation it takes to implode a building, If you did you would understand why it could not have been done on 911 without many people knowing about it.”
The majority of that preparation is required to comply with EPA standards.. you know, to avoid (among other things) the health problems that all the first-responders are currently experiencing?
Regarding people knowing about it - when was the last time you heard top-secret classified information “leaked” to the public? The US Government has engineered new planes, new weapons, launched satellites, etc, all without anything “leaking” out. There’s a reason they do some of the most extensive background checks around - to avoid those situations (and it’s worked out well for them).
Either way, I’m not even necessarily sold on the fact that it was a controlled demolition, even though there’s circumstantial evidence to support it. I do know that those buildings did not collapse naturally, though. Bottom line: show me another natural collapse that resulted in the same % of dust, had visible squibs during the collapse, and transformed humans into bone fragments.
“The majority of that preparation is required to comply with EPA standards..”
What I am talking about is the work it takes to make a building collapse in a controlled fashion. You don’t know that pre-weakening of the building has to be done. Beams are partially pre-cut so the explosive can do it’s work. Explosives are wrapped in blast blankets and often chain link fencing to concentrate the blast on the beams. Cables are rigged to help pull parts of the building inwards as other parts fall down. Don’t believe me? Read up on it, educate yourself to how this stuff works. Or you can continue to cruse the conspiracy theorist sites and remain stupid.
“The US Government has engineered new planes, new weapons, launched satellites, etc, all without anything “leaking” out. There’s a reason they do some of the most extensive background checks around - to avoid those situations (and it’s worked out well for them).”
Now this one is funny as hell!
Leaks are a way of life in the government, all they can do if hope stuff will remain under the public radar and when it does come to light, start the SPIN machine. What I think is you watch to many movies where the government has hundreds of evil henchmen and loyal tight lipped employees. Here is a clue. Those are movies and NOT real life.
“Bottom line: show me another natural collapse that resulted in the same % of dust, had visible squibs during the collapse, and transformed humans into bone fragments.”
I see what it is now. You don’t understand the simple physics of this event. You think that some outside energy source had to be in play to do all that damage (bombs). But you don’t realize all the energy to do that damage was always there.
It is a matter of conservation of energy, Look it up, it’s high school stuff. Energy can never be lost, Nearly all the energy that went into building the towers was storied in them as potential kinetic energy. Mass plus the pull of gravity, very powerful stuff on that scale.
That is exactly how “Implosions” work. Companies like Controlled Demolition do not use explosive to pulverize buildings, they let gravity do the work for them and only use explosives to start the collapse. Like I said educate yourself on the subject.
Every steel beam, every pound of concrete, every slab of drywall, furniture, paper and even people put energy into the towers, and all it took to release it was fire weaken steel. Imaging all that drywall and people being crushed by tons of steel. Yeah you have dust and bones.
Regarding leaks: kindly point me to the most recent top-secret information that was leaked to the media.
Regarding conservation of energy: thanks for the refresher, but I’m already very familiar with that. Since you claim it’s such a textbook case, please point me to another collapse where the same sort of thing happened: concrete was turned mostly into dust, human remains (if any) were found in the form of bone fragments, and squib-like explosions were seen during the collapse.
Since you’re familiar with conservation of energy, then you also know that the energy can only be used once. There wasn’t enough energy to break through the path of most resistance, AND turn everything into dust, AND blow 5-6 ton pieces of steel the length of a football field away.
It’s simple, just show me one other natural building collapse with the same apparent “abundance” of energy is released. This is high-school stuff, right? Shouldn’t be that hard.. but if it is, how about pointing me to one other natural collapse of ANYTHING (building, rocks, etc.) where human bone fragments were produced?
(tumbleweed rolls by)
So admin says fires weakend hardened steel and damage did it? You mean those so-called “raging fires” that were so intense… they barely spread to the other side? Those fires? You talk like you know physics but my guess is you failed. Damage on the south side of a building will not cause all the support columns of hardened steel to collapse simultaneously. Damage on one side of a building will cause a building to fall over on its side… but that didn’t happen. Office fires do not burn at temperatures hot enough, especially with black smoke, to affect hardened steel in the time WTC7 burned. And office fires certainly do not burn hot enough to be picked up by NASA imagery days later still burning at extremely hot temperatures that are too hot to be caused by simple office fires.
I seem to remember a project called the Manhattan project. It involved over 100,000 people who all kept their mouth, and the secret, safe for five years until the day the bomb went off in war. The government’s Tuskegee Syphilis project lasted from 1932 to 1972 until it was discovered. That’s 40 years of silence!!! The government not only can pull off true conspiracies it already has. The government HAS already murdered Americans. What HONOR is there in trying to defend such a DISHONORABLE government with a record of lying and murder? Is that the type of person that you are?